INOC
 
Home

Vol 10 Issue 1
 News
 Contents
 Products
 Safety
 Datafiles

Next News
 

 

 


Newsdesk - February 2004

Copper competitive with fibre optic cable for LANs?

Penn State engineers have developed and simulation tested a copper wire transmission scheme for distributing a broadband signal over local area networks (LANS) with a lower average bit error rate than fibre optic cable that is ten times more expensive.

Dr Mohsen Kavehrad, the WL Weiss professor of electrical engineering and director of the Center for Information and Communications Technology Research who led the study, says, "Using copper wire is much cheaper than fibre optic cable and, often, the wire is already in place. Our approach can improve the capability of existing local area networks and shows that copper is a competitor for new installations in the niche LAN market."

The Penn State approach specifies a signalling scheme for a next generation broadband copper Ethernet network capable of carrying broadband signals of 10 gigabits per second. Currently, the IEEE standard carries one gigabit over 100m of Category 5 copper wire which has four twisted pairs of wire in each cable.

"In the existing copper gigabit systems, each pair of wires carries 250 megabits per second. For a 10 gigabit system, each pair will have to carry 2.5 gigabits per sec," Kavehrad explains. "At these higher speeds, some energy penetrates into the other wires and produces crosstalk." The Penn State scheme eliminates crosstalk by using a new error correction method they developed that jointly codes and decodes the signal and, in decoding, corrects the errors.

"Conventional wisdom says you should deal with the wire pairs one pair at a time but we look at them jointly. We use the fact that we know what signal is causing the crosstalk interference because it is the strongest signal on one of the wires," says Kavehrad. The Penn State approach also takes account of the reduction or loss of signal energy between one end of the cable and the other that can become severe in 100m copper systems. "We jointly code and decode the signals in an iterative fashion and, at the same time, we equalise the signals. The new error correction approach acts like a vacuum cleaner where you first go over the rough spots and then go back again to pick up more particles."

Penn State

Reply number u111

 

Home    Magazine    Directory    Show Reviews    Links    Media Guide

© Copyright 2004 Magpye Publishing Ltd.